A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
✓Claimant Hugo Palacios Mejia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia
- Finalidad
- Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
Luego de analizar los argumentos del recurrente, la Sala Plena de la Corporación consideró que la demanda y su corrección no lograron constituir un cargo de constitucionalidad por vulneración del principio de unidad de materia y del principio democrático.
Con base en lo anterior, se CONFIRMÓ en todas sus partes el auto cuestionado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 29 de noviembre de 2019, proferido por el magistrado Carlos Bernal Pulido, mediante el cual rechazo el
- segundo. cargo de la demanda presentada por Hugo Palacios Mejia, en el expediente bajo radicado D-13541.
- SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al demandante, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, ARCHIVAR el expediente D-13541.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.